A woman being a bread winner
- Thread starter cherry123
- Start date
I have known cases like this The man would be a househusband and the women would provide the daily bread.
I don't see anything wrong with a woman being the primary financial provider for her household. What matters most is that partners discuss their situation openly, make decisions together, and respect each other's contributions whether financial, domestic, or both.
I believe there is nothing wrong with the arrangement. In some families, the husband takes care of the children and manages household chores while the wife works in the office. I am quite sure they have carefully discussed and agreed upon this arrangement.
I do not see any problem with the wife being the breadwinner, as long as the couple agrees and respects each other's role and contribution to the family.
It would only be a problem when the man is not contributing financially or even growing. Some women just are rich by luck or providence. Does that mean they should not provide for their families?
- Thread starter
- #11
How about it the man want to be a house husband and only tends to the kids without wanting to work outside the home?
It still depends on how the couple wants to run their home.
- Thread starter
- #14
Yeah I think it should not be about the gender. if the wife is good with bread making then the husband should let go and support the wife.
I agree that it depends on a family's cultures and practices. In my family, our parents do not oblige us to give money.
Every home should be defined according to specific values that make it tick. I am not saying it is wrong or right for a woman to be provider. But if it works for a home, it is fine.
It is a matter of choice and agreement between the head and light of the family, then there is no need to make it a big concern for them.
