Do you think a website should have 2 admins?

[Hate2Wait]

I think it is better if a website has more than 1 admin as it will help the users and even admins to take time off from work and other admin can take over like we have two admins here but the only thing is the other admin should have payment access too and they should pay so that users do not need to wait for long for the 1st admin to arrive.

 

[Carson20t]

I think that there should be a good system and prior communication to facilitate the smooth operation of the business.I also emphasize that deliberation of duties is the most effective way of doing things in case of any relapses.That is a way a systematic business should operate.In the event of RIF and when it started it was going to be called an LLC company and such a company has an organizational structure with various ventures incorporated.All that cannot be handled by one person or one imdividual.

 

[Desireu30b]

I think websites should have more than two admin, they should always have equal rights to settings, optimizations Payments and many more.
there is a saying team work makes the dream work.

 

[Starmix]

It could happen depending on the plan of the site owner. And if it happens, they must have a 50/50 capital and also have a Memorandum of Understanding to avoid conflicts. It is a business matter that involves payments and site maintenance.

 

[Hate2Wait]

Having more than 1 admin helps but it will help more if both admins can pay like we have seen on forum coin where both fergal and cyber can pay

 

[freelancermaria]

Yes, it is a good idea to have two administrators on a website. In case the owner is not present, the other admin can take charge. He or she can answer queries, process payments, etc.

 

[eldavis]

It is definitely important but not necessary. A website having two admins would definitely make running the site a lot easier, especially in a situation where the admins are usually busy, they can easily share themselves.

 

[Starmix]

It depends on the site owner if he likes to have another administrator. There's only one owner of a website and don't expect they'll be in good terms as to decisions. For me it's not feasible.

 

[nomad]

I think a website that has a lot of activities should have multiple staff members to look after the site 24 hours, since admin cannot be online 24 hours, he can hire another admin or a moderator to look after site operation.

 

[Stardom22]

ln my own opinion, l would like to say that, it will depend on the type and nature of the website in question. Some bigger websites with very many members are most ideally for two or more admins

 

[timewo]

The admin only has to work for a few hours a day or less if the websites are well designed, unless there is a major problem. Two admins are required if the website is large and making plenty of money.

 

[SHAHID987]

I think a website should have more than one admin with equal power and access over all concern things. Because the work load will be dilute and members will get responses promptly.

 

[Starmix]

It is very impossible to have two admins on one website considering that it is owned by one person. Who would dominate? Are they ging to split the earnings? Are they going to split the fees for website maintenance?

 

[Etini Willie]

I think the admin position is a voluntary position and if there are people that volunteer for it, no qualms.

 

[cherry123]

Yes websites should have more than two admin, they should always have equal rights as they are the admins as they can do the settings, optimizations processes together

 

[Hate2Wait]

This will have both pros and cons as 2 admins may not think the same way and may have different targets and expectations from the website

 

[Shavkat]

We used to have moderators here. I do not know what happened to them. I, myself was one of them.

 

[Kosi G]

The other admin might need to be paid and not all sites are able to afford that.

 

[Hate2Wait]

Forum coin is a little different because they have fergal as main admin and cyber is a tech admin and have all the rights to make changes