Who should bear the cost of the real estate agent in a rental transaction: the landlord or the tenant? This is a topic that has been debated for many years and one that continues to generate a lot of discussion. On one hand, some believe that the landlord should cover the cost of the real estate agent because they are the one who is looking to rent out their property and benefit from the transaction.
On the other hand, others argue that the tenant should bear the cost because they are the one who is searching for a suitable property and will ultimately benefit from the services provided by the agent.
Do you believe the landlord or the tenant should be responsible for paying the real estate agent?
On the other hand, others argue that the tenant should bear the cost because they are the one who is searching for a suitable property and will ultimately benefit from the services provided by the agent.
Do you believe the landlord or the tenant should be responsible for paying the real estate agent?
Last edited by a moderator:
