In my opinion, it is inevitable that conflicts may happen in working in the business. If you come to think of it, most individuals are not created to be in unison. They are diversified and have differences. Although it is an advantage because they can colloborate to each other and can formulate brilliant ideas despite the differences. It is a diversified working relationship.
Do you believe that disagreements are an essential component of the business process?
- Thread starter Shavkat
- Start date
If it's about thinking out a solution that is going to use in making the business grow, I believe that there will always be disagreement and in the end there should always be a consensus that the company is going to follow.
It is true that disagreement could be an effective component of business because during the business negotiation, there is meant to be a kind of disagreement.
Yes, it is okay to leave room for disagreement because it is healthy but I would agree with others that in the end, it should be for the benefit of the entire group and its objective and goals. If they are taken too personally then it is not constructive and will just taint the image of your organization as being unprofessional and visionless.
Whenever two or more people are working together there is always a high chance of them disagreeing on some things that they are doing which is something that is very normal.
Where man abounded, there are likely going to be disagreement. Disagreement occurs as a result of divergent views on policies or ideas. Where this occur it is better to be progressive disagreement and not the negative one borne out of hatred.
- Thread starter
- #8
It is inevitable to have disagreements along the process. It would be a bad thing if they cannot arrive to final decisions in solving business problems. I am sure they can find their ways to agree to these concerns for the sake of the company's welfare.
It is inevitable to have disagreements in the workplace. What is important is to have a mechanism which can resolve the disagreements and turn them into valuable contributions by different workers. Different opinions can be discussed openly in meetings and the Chairperson can act as a mediator to help the workers to reach a consensus.
- Thread starter
- #10
I do agree that it should be intervened by one of the members in the top management. I am sure the conflicts will be pacified and resolved without any shortcomings or inhibitions.
Disagreement is an essential tool in business development. It is possible for everyone to perceive something in the same direction. So where there is divergent views, we should all review it and bring out points that would be productive to the business.
During a business process there is bound to be a disagreement and you've got to reach a consensus as well.
Disagreement is not bad at all. It is constructive tool in business development so far it is not borne out of envy. Provisions allowed divergent opinions to be expressed. From this disagreement, tangible points could be derived and accepted upon by the generality of the board.
- Thread starter
- #14
I do think that they have different views, but they can achieve the common goals. They can put the diversified ideas into a more effective plans or techniques for the company.
As long as it's about how to run the business successfully, there will always be disagreement on the things that should be done so that they will make sure that they follow the right channels.
Yes o. That is why I support the motion that say disagreement is vital in business development. However such disagreement must not be borne out of envy or jealousy. It must be purely on idea differences. It is when this is observed then we can say disagreement is relevant.
Sometimes we will disagree to agree on a particular issue and it will bring out the best in US.
I have had disagreement with co workers and we resolve it as quick as possible. It works well when the workers are cooperative.
